How national security and international affairs are reshaped as AGI capability advances.

About 50% of the work in National Security and International Affairs is information-shaped and increasingly AI-deliverable, with the rest a hybrid of judgment and hands-on work. The automation frontier runs straight through the middle of this role.
Why: Lacking populated child occupations or UNSPSC product data, this composite is evaluated based solely on its NAICS subsector name and description. "National Security and International Affairs" encompasses a broad scope of work ranging from purely physical military field operations and defense installations to highly digital intelligence analysis, cyber command, and diplomatic administration. This resolves to the center of the hybrid band (0.50) to reflect the blend of physical forces and knowledge-based bureaucracy.
grounded in the economy graph · digital scalar 0.50 · hybrid
Read as an executable program — the work decomposed into Code, Generative, Agentic, and Human.
National Security and International Affairs sits inside a larger value-flow — 1 parent structure it composes into. The hierarchy is grounding, not the story: it tells you which aggregate exposure National Security and International Affairs inherits.
National Security and International Affairs links to 2 entities via `specializes` — a real edge on the economy graph, surfaced here so the claim stays grounded in data rather than assertion.
National Security and International Affairs is itself composed of 5 parts that flow up into it — the sub-units whose work, summed, is what AGI capability re-prices here first.
Node-intrinsic problems read straight off the graph (exposesProblem) — the evergreen wedges a builder could take into this space.
No articles yet for this entity.
No capability events for this entity yet.