Processes

Evaluate suppliers

How evaluate suppliers are reshaped as AGI capability advances.

ProcessesEvaluate suppliers
Evaluate suppliers — illustrated

The bottom line

Roughly 80% of the work in Evaluate suppliers is information-shaped — already within reach of AI delivery. The question here is not whether it shifts, but which tasks go first and who staffs the residual.

Why: With no seeded child occupations, this APQC process is evaluated based on its name and procurement context. 'Evaluate suppliers' involves reviewing bids, certifications, and performance metrics—predominantly information transformation and knowledge work that occurs in digital ERP or document-management surfaces, placing it firmly in the digital band.

grounded in the economy graph · digital scalar 0.80 · digital

Business-as-Code

Read as an executable program — the work decomposed into Code, Generative, Agentic, and Human.

Evaluate suppliers sits inside a larger value-flow — 1 parent structure it composes into. The hierarchy is grounding, not the story: it tells you which aggregate exposure Evaluate suppliers inherits.

Where Evaluate suppliers sits

Related articles

No articles yet for this entity.

Recent capability events

No capability events for this entity yet.

How the work flows

Trigger: A sourcing requirement is generated or a scheduled periodic review initiates the assessment of potential or current suppliers.

  1. Define compliance, quality, and financial evaluation criteria
  2. Distribute request for information and compliance questionnaires
  3. Conduct technical, quality, and financial risk assessments
  4. Perform site audits and review aerospace certifications
  5. Score and rank suppliers against baseline thresholds
  6. Update the approved supplier list with final status

Outcome: Suppliers are scored, categorized by capability and risk, and formally approved or disqualified for procurement.

Measured by

Evaluation Cycle TimeCost Per EvaluationSupplier Risk ScoreSupplier Approval Rate