How security systems services are reshaped as AGI capability advances.

About 50% of the work in Security Systems Services is information-shaped and increasingly AI-deliverable, with the rest a hybrid of judgment and hands-on work. The automation frontier runs straight through the middle of this role.
Why: Based on the NAICS industry description, this composite encompasses both physical installation and repair of hardware (alarms, locking devices) as well as desk-based remote monitoring services. Because no child occupations are seeded, I rely on the industry definition, which splits evenly between highly physical field work and highly digital surveillance, placing it squarely in the center of the hybrid band.
grounded in the economy graph · digital scalar 0.50 · hybrid
Read as an executable program — the work decomposed into Code, Generative, Agentic, and Human.
Security Systems Services sits inside a larger value-flow — 1 parent structure it composes into. The hierarchy is grounding, not the story: it tells you which aggregate exposure Security Systems Services inherits.
Security Systems Services links to 2 entities via `specializes` — a real edge on the economy graph, surfaced here so the claim stays grounded in data rather than assertion.
Security Systems Services is itself composed of 2 parts that flow up into it — the sub-units whose work, summed, is what AGI capability re-prices here first.
Which of this work becomes digital labor — performed under typed authority, promoted to autonomy on track record.
Security Systems Services employs 119 occupations — the workforce whose routine, information-shaped tasks an autonomous stack can take under typed authority.
+107 more via employs
Node-intrinsic problems read straight off the graph (exposesProblem) — the evergreen wedges a builder could take into this space.
+3 more problems on the graph
No articles yet for this entity.
No capability events for this entity yet.